This is confounding for a lot of people – just like the opening verse of Green Light, which holds the drums back for ages, and even then layers them deep beneath the piano.Įven the influences behind Sonic are incorrect. In Sonic, you must learn through repetition rather than observation. To reach the more reward-intensive upper levels, you need to master the exact distances and timings between launch pads and obstacles, but it’s impossible to garner this information on a first run-through because the speed of the game – its main appeal – hides everything from you. As in Green Light, the melody and the maths are wrong new players always find it hard to read the screen, because it’s not working like a good game. In a single playthrough, you only ever get a passing feel for the levels you miss vast areas – all the rules are broken. Sonic doesn’t do this – all it establishes at the beginning is that speed is important. In his excellent book on game design, A Theory of Fun, Raph Koster, says the essence of good game design is teaching – a well constructed level slowly introduces you to its themes, and shows you how to beat them. Then you get a series of neatly placed hazards that present discrete challenges. If you take a classic platform game design, such as Super Mario Bros – the player is always given the chance to read the level: to look ahead and assess every new piece of scenery or patrolling enemy.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |